|
|
2020 Focus 7 (Appropriate Technology for Sustainable Food), Brief 8 of 9, August 2001
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES
|
|
Food security for a growing population cannot be attained without the elimination of rural poverty. Solving the energy problem of the rural areas can be a major component of poverty alleviation and requires understanding the nature of energy use, the available technology choices, and fuel mix for these areas. Rural areas of most developing countries rely predominantly on biofuels, mainly fuelwood, for their fuel needs. Biomass fuels—fuelwood, crop residues, and animal dung—provide 85–90 percent of domestic energy in rural areas and 75 percent of all rural energy. In the rural economy of India, for example, the domestic household sector is the most prominent energy consumer, followed by the agricultural sector.
Inefficient biomass use in traditional devices has serious environmental effects, locally and globally. The burning of biomass fuels leads to high levels of indoor air pollution that especially affect women and children. Deforestation and a rapidly declining resource base make provision of alternative energy to rural areas for ecological sustainability a crucial prerequisite for food security.
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY OPTIONS
Many rural communities consume little electricity, and extending electricity grids to meet their energy needs may prove more costly and take longer than harnessing new and renewable sources of energy already available in these communities—wind, solar, and biomass—through renewable energy technologies (RETs). The attractiveness of these sources lies primarily in their abundance and ready access. The RETs for exploiting these sources include biogas plants, solar lanterns, solar home lighting systems, improved cookstoves, improved kerosene lanterns, solar water pumping systems, solar water heating systems, and water mills.
Programs already in place show the viability of using RETs. The Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources (MNES) of India has been promoting the use of photovoltaic technology for energizing unelectrified villages and homes for nearly 15 years. Despite the high initial cost of photovoltaic systems, for certain decentralized applications involving relatively low-load and low-capacity use of conventional power equipment, photovoltaic systems are cost-effective on the basis of life-cycle cost. The life-cycle cost calculations of photovoltaic applications—home lighting systems, water pumping systems, and power plants—show that small-capacity photovoltaic systems are generally competitive with grid extension in locations that are 3–5 kilometers away from the gridline. Technological and commercial innovations have brought the photovoltaic market within the reach of low-income users. Globally, for example, the cost per watt (peak) of photovoltaic energy fell from about US$25 in 1980 to around US$3.50–4.00 in 2000 (see figure). In Kenya, more than 2.5 megawatts of photovoltaic electricity has been sold, mostly to households in rural areas. In India, the total installed capacity of photovoltaic systems was 47 megawatts as of December 2000; additionally 18 megawatts have been exported.
Wind power has also proved to be a viable energy alternative. In India, more than 1.3 gigawatts of wind energy capacity has been added over the past six years exclusively in the private sector, which either sells electricity to the electric utilities or wheels it over the utility grid for self-consumption. Studies indicate that cooking with biogas (a highly combustible fuel comprising methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulphide, produced through anaerobic fermentation of organic matter) can be cheaper than cooking with any commercial fuel. In 2000, for instance, using kerosene in a cooking system (Nutan stove) yielded energy and levelized annual costs of Rs 1.60 and 1.65 per kilowatt-hour, respectively, compared with Rs 0.61 and 0.33 per kilowatt-hour, respectively, for a cooking system using biogas (controlled pressure). The Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI) has installed or disseminated renewable and energy-efficient technologies in about a hundred villages in different parts of India (see table) by setting up demonstration projects involving and enhancing the capacities of local people to plan, install, and manage these interventions. The key features of these technology-transfer projects were the close involvement of the communities and their contributions of cash and labor to the efforts. These interventions have functioned well, and the community-based institutional arrangements put in place take care of operation and maintenance problems encountered in the long term.
BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY OPTIONS
Alternative energy options enable local institutions to manage their own energy needs and thus provide rural development opportunities. This situation encourages decentralized decisionmaking, which has far-reaching implications for the governance of a community. In addition, dissemination and popularization of energy-efficient devices and alternatives to conventional fuels can do the following:
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY OPTIONS: PRIORITIES AND POLICIES FOR PROMOTION
Much of the innovation in RETs, such as photovoltaic cells and wind energy equipment, has emanated from the developed world. In many poor rural areas of the developing world, however, innovations in use of biomass resources may have greater relevance. Even in the case of wind power, large generators have been developed essentially for feeding power into the grid while applications for using wind power in groundwater irrigation have received inadequate attention. National governments, multilateral organizations, and the corporate sector need to involve the rural poor in defining priorities for renewable energy development. Biomass gasifiers, for example, if properly developed and used, could generate decentralized power at prices lower than that from photovoltaic systems.
Therefore, in addition to reorienting research and development priorities, public policy must aim at disseminating RETs in the developing world to reduce costs. Already several technologies—solar water heating, biomethanation, and biomass gasification—are viable alternatives in most rural situations. Removing subsidies on polluting fuels and grid-based power is essential, however, as these make RETs less attractive economically as alternatives. Apart from fiscal policies and measures, the development and large-scale use of RETs would require major interventions at the grassroots level, including the provision of microfinancing arrangements. In summary, a sustainable approach for poverty alleviation employing energy-technology interventions would essentially need to address the following:
Finally, global food security cannot be attained unless poverty among the world’s rural population is eliminated. Innovative approaches to solving the energy problems of this segment of the human race are important not only because past efforts have largely failed, but also because alternative energy technologies are opening up exciting new opportunities in this area. R. K. Pachauri (pachauri@teri.res.in) and Pooja Mehrotra (poojas@teri.res.in) are director general and research associate, respectively, of the Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
|
"A 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and the Environment" is an initiative of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) to develop a shared vision and a consensus for action on how to meet future world food needs while reducing poverty and protecting the environment. Through the 2020 Vision initiative, IFPRI is bringing together divergent schools of thought on these issues, generating research, and identifying recommendations. |
|
TOP of the page
|