International Food Policy Research Institute
IFPRI Home About Contact Careers Search  
Publications
IFPRI Publications 2020 Publications Search our Database Articles & Book Chapters Datasets Other Languages Order Form AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Discussion Paper No. 778
On-Site and Off-Site Long-Term Economic Impacts of Soil Fertility Management Practices
The Case of Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Kenya
Ephraim Nkonya, Patrick Gicheru, Johannes Woelcke, Barrack Okoba, Daniel Kilambya, and Louis N. Gachimbi
July 2008
Abstract

This article analyzes the on-site and off-site economic impacts of various sustainable land management (SLM) practices in Kenya. Long-term trial data are used to establish the relationship between SLM practices and maize yield. The analysis of on-site effects focuses on the profitability of maize production at the farm level, while the examined off-site effects include carbon sequestration and siltation from maize farms, which increase the cost of potable water production. The major contribution of this study is the use of long-term experimental data to estimate the impacts of land management practices on crop yield and consider their off-site benefits and costs.

The results of this study show that soil and water conservation (SWC) structures reinforced with leguminous plants are more profitable when the plants are used as fodder, as opposed to situations in which only SWC structures are used. SWC structures reinforced with vegetation had lower maintenance costs, whereas those that were not reinforced with leguminous trees were not profitable over the long-term period. These results suggest that complementary and multipurpose SWC practices are more likely to be adopted compared to non-complementary and/or single-purpose practices. Thus, SWC practices should be promoted as a package of complementary technologies. If it is not feasible to promote a mix of complementary enterprises, high value crops are likely to make SLM practices more profitable. In areas where SLM practices are not profitable, promotion of alternative livelihoods is necessary. Adoption of SLM also provides global environmental services worth 10% of the net present value of the SLM practices over the 50-year period addressed in the present study Finally, the results of this analysis suggest that farmers who offer significant environmental services should be compensated for their efforts.

Download

Full Text
Send Feedback

We will post selected comments on this website. Please see our feedback guidelines for more information. Your e-mail address is required, but on request will not be posted.

Please use this form only for comments on this publication. To order a copy of the publication, please fill out the order form. For general comments on the website, use our website feedback form.

E-mail:
Post email address    Do Not Post email address
Comments:
    

TOP of the page