book chapter

Linking smallholders to the new agricultural economy: The case of the plataformas de concertación in Ecuador

by Ramina Cavatassi,
Mario González-Flores,
Paul Winters,
Jorge Andrade-Piedra,
Patricio Espinosa and
Graham Thiele
Publisher(s): international food policy research institute (ifpri)
Open Access | CC BY-NC-ND-4.0
Citation
Cavatassi, Ramina; González-Flores, Mario; Winters, Paul; Andrade-Piedra, Jorge; Espinosa, Patricio; and Thiele, Graham. 2016. Linking smallholders to the new agricultural economy: The case of the plataformas de concertación in Ecuador. In Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges. Devaux, André; Torero, Máximo; Donovan, Jason; Horton, Douglas (Eds.). Chapter 12. Pp. 375-410. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/9780896292130_12

The authors of Chapter 12 (Cavatassi et al.) performed an ex-post evaluation using econometric techniques common in impact evaluations. They assessed whether participation in Ecuador’s Plataformas program, which establishes alliances between small-scale farmers and a range of agricultural support-service providers, had any effect on income. The chapter finds that the program had a positive impact on yields, prices, and gross margins. The authors conducted baseline household and community surveys in two Ecuadorean provinces and then identified treatment communities. Using data from the most recent census, they constructed a counterfactual control group with similar geographical, agroecological, and sociodemographic characteristics to the treatment communities. They then used PSM to identify which control communities were most similar to each treatment community. In addition to creating control communities, they also factored in households in treatment communities that did not participate in the program. The PSM procedure allowed the authors to select a control community that was very similar to each treatment community in all observable aspects except for the treatment status, thus providing a proper counterfactual for each treatment community.