The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the University of North Carolina (UNC), the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), University of Buffalo (UB), and the Prevention Collaborative have convened a collaborative research program on cash transfers and intimate partner violence (IPV). The overall long-term goal of the collaborative is to advance the research agenda linking cash transfers and IPV to effectively leverage cash programming for IPV prevention among poor and vulnerable women in low- and middle-income settings.
Motivation for the collaborative’s research
A growing evidence base demonstrates that cash transfers have potential to reduce IPV. In a mixed-method review of rigorous studies from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), eleven out of fourteen quantitative studies (79%) and five out of eight qualitative studies (63%) demonstrated that cash transfers decrease IPV (Buller et al. 2018). In explaining the impacts, studies generally relied on three hypothesized pathways through which cash could affect IPV: Economic security and emotional wellbeing, intra-household conflict, and women’s empowerment.
Despite the promising conclusions of the review and evidence to date, there are significant gaps in the understanding of linkages between cash transfers and IPV. For example, there are large regional gaps in the evidence—with the majority of quantitative evidence coming from Latin America, but only two empirical studies from Africa and one from South Asia. In addition, mechanisms are poorly understood, with most studies not designed to rigorously test these and few using mixed methods to understand how or why changes occur. Moreover, few studies were designed to test what program design features – such as size, recipient, or duration of transfers—or complementary programming are most promising to leverage impacts of cash on IPV.
Although cash transfers are attractive instruments for addressing IPV from a policy perspective – as they are rapidly expanding in resource-poor settings and often directly reach women and vulnerable households – policymakers focused on social protection often do not have IPV on their agendas, nor are they aware of the potential benefits of cash transfers for IPV prevention. Coordination and communication amongst the larger group of researchers and implementation partners interested in cash transfers and IPV is important for designing a coherent long-term approach to addressing key knowledge gaps.
Objectives of the collaborative
The overall long-term goal of the collaborative is to advance the research agenda linking cash transfers and IPV—defining and contributing evidence to knowledge gaps, aggregating evidence, bringing together researchers and practitioners, and disseminating research findings via channels which maximize evidence uptake for policy—in order to effectively leverage cash programming for IPV prevention. The current phase of the research collaborative’s work (2022 – 2024) has three objectives. The first involves evidence generation via a coordinated small grants fund for eight primary studies advancing evidence on four main research questions. A second component focuses on knowledge mobilization, expanding engagement with a broader stakeholder group, focused on implementing organizations and policymakers, through technical assistance, research translation, dissemination, advocacy. The third component involves advancing the broader research agenda between economic strengthening issues and IPV.
Outputs / Resources
Clare Barrington
Associate Professor, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public HealthAna Maria Buller
Associate Professor, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLori Heise
Professor, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthMelissa Hidrobo
Senior Research Fellow, IFPRITia Palermo
Associate Professor, University at BuffaloAmber Peterman
Associate Research Professor, Department of Public Policy, UNCMeghna Ranganathan
Assistant Professor, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLucy Billings
Senior Program Manager, IFPRIShalini Roy
Senior Research Fellow
‘Joy, not sorrow’: Men's perspectives on gender, violence, and cash transfers targeted to women in northern Ghana
Cash transfers and intimate partner violence: A research view on design and implementation for risk mitigation and prevention
Global research into cash transfers to prevent intimate partner violence
Government of Ethiopia's public works and complementary programmes: A mixed-methods study on pathways to reduce intimate partner violence
Cross-disciplinary intersections between public health and economics in intimate partner violence research
Intimate partner relationships and gender norms in Mali: The scope of cash transfers targeted to men to reduce intimate partner violence
Cash transfers and intimate partner violence (IPV) in low- and middle-income settings: A joint research agenda to inform policy and practice
Cash transfers conditional on schooling reduce IPV among young women in South Africa
Food and cash transfers coupled with nutrition behavior change communication lead to sustained reductions in intimate partner violence in Bangladesh
Cash, food, and vouchers reduce intimate partner violence in urban areas in Ecuador
Cash transfers and intimate partner violence: What does the evidence say?
- Event Post
How is economic security linked to violence against women and children? New insights from the Sexual Violence Research Initiative Forum 2022
- Issue Post
Why gender-sensitive social protection is critical to the COVID-19 response in low- and middle-income countries
- Event Post
How is economic security linked to gender-based violence? New insights from the Sexual Violence Research Initiative Forum 2019
- Event Post
Reducing intimate partner violence through cash transfers: The next research frontier
- Research Post
Cash transfers and intimate partner violence
- Issue Post
Can cash transfers prevent intimate partner violence?
A growing evidence base demonstrates that cash transfer programs, primarily meant to address poverty and vulnerability, are promising interventions to reduce intimate partner violence. However, knowledge gaps remain on whether findings generalize across program designs, as well as what mechanisms underlie impacts.
Featured Highlights
Cash transfers and intimate partner violence (IPV)
Interest from global stakeholders has grown over the past 5 years in the relationship between cash transfers and gender-based violence, and in particular, intimate partner violence (IPV).
Cash transfers, polygamy, and intimate partner violence: Experimental evidence from Mali
Cash transfer programs primarily targeting women in Latin America and East Africa have been shown to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV), but knowledge gaps remain on how impacts differ by program features and context.
Can Cash Transfers & BCC reduce IPV four years post-program?
Food and cash transfers with behavior change communication lead to sustained reductions in IPV in Bangladesh.