journal article

A pre-pandemic nutrition-sensitive social protection program has sustained benefits for food security and diet diversity in Myanmar during a severe economic crisis

by Elisa M. Maffioli,
Derek D. Headey,
Isabel Lambrecht,
Than Zaw Oo and
Nicholus Tint Zaw
Open Access | CC BY-4.0
Citation
Maffioli, Elisa M.; Headey, Derek D.; Lambrecht, Isabel; Oo, Than Zaw; and Zaw, Nicholus Tint. A pre-pandemic nutrition-sensitive social protection program has sustained benefits for food security and diet diversity in Myanmar during a severe economic crisis. Journal of Nutrition 153(4): 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.02.009

Background
One third of pre-school children in Myanmar were stunted in 2015-16, and three quarters of children 6-23 months had inadequate diet diversity. In response, a large-scale nutrition-sensitive social protection program was implemented over 2016-2019. In 2020, however, Myanmar’s economy was hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic, and harder still by a military takeover in 2021.

Objective
To examine whether former beneficiaries of this program experienced better food security, food consumption, and diet diversity outcomes in the wake of major economic shocks.

Methods
In a previous cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted over 2016-2019, pregnant women and their under-2 children were randomly assigned to either: (1) Cash; (2) Cash + Social and Behavioral Change Communication (SBCC); or (3) a control group. A sub-sample of these former participants were then re-surveyed ten times from June 2020 to December 2021 during Myanmar’s protracted economic crisis. Randomized treatment exposure was used in a regression analysis to test for post-program impacts on Food Insecurity Experience Scale indicators, household food consumption, and maternal and child diet diversity. We also examined the impacts on household income as a secondary outcome and potential impact pathway.

Results
Both intervention arms reported lower food insecurity, more frequent consumption of nutritious foods, and more diverse maternal and child diets compared to households in the control group. However, the improved dietary outcomes were larger for mothers and children exposed to Cash+SBCC compared to Cash, as was their monthly household income.

Conclusions
The findings suggest that a program combining cash transfers with nutrition-related education can yield sustained benefits one to two years after the program was completed. This strengthens the evidence to support the expansion and scale-up of nutrition-sensitive social welfare programs to redress chronic malnutrition and enhance nutritional resilience in the face of a severe economic crisis.