Search
Conceptual framework
Subsidized credit programs for agricultural producers have often been used to boost production in less developed countries.
Although it is widely believed that food aid distorts incentives to increase agricultural production, detailed empirical country studies conducted in recent years suggest that the disincentive effect of food aid has been overemphasized.
Accelerated growth in agricultural production of developing countries depends on exploiting more fully the existing production potential and continuously raising that potential through technological change.
Policies to strengthen incentives to expand food production through higher food prices are likely to result in short-run reductions in real incomes of food consumers.
Agricultural production is typically a risky business. Farmers face a variety of price, yield, and resource risks which make their incomes unstable from year to year. In many cases farmers are also confronted by the risk of catastrophe.
The weight of agricultural prices in political debate, their searing importance to the poor, and their common association with unusually low agricultural output levels often lead to policies that focus directly on prices at the expense of other un
Public intervention in foodgrain markets is pervasive in most developing countries.
Public stock management
Governments in developing countries have traditionally played a dominant role in foodgrain supply management. The problems and issues raised by this intervention have been analyzed in a number of studies made during the last decade.
Agricultural price policies and allied instruments evolved in India in the context of shortages and excess demand during World War II (India 1975).
Determination of agricultural prices is intensely political because of its profound influence on equity, income distribution, consumption, production, and economic development.
This chapter analyzes the combined effect of commercial policy and ex-change rate management on relative prices affecting agriculture.
Relative prices in the People's Republic of China: Rural taxation through public monopsony
The government of the People's Republic of China has used agricultural price policies and other instruments which influence or determine relative prices in agriculture since the early 1950s.
Economic growth is achieved largely through capital accumulation and technical change. However, these two processes are not independent.
The substantial growth in world cereal production of the past two and onehalf decades has been accompanied by a widening band of variability around the trend.
The public expects a responsible government to foster growth to provide greater income and well-being in the future, equity to provide a fair society and social cohesion, and stability to reduce the tensions of uncertainty and the likelihood of a
Forces underlying commodity trade, capital movement, technology transfer, and political cooperation contribute to increased interdependence among nations.
The economic argument for intervention in product or factor markets in the agricultural sector rests largely on the need to provide incentives to producers.