Back

Who we are

With research staff from more than 60 countries, and offices across the globe, IFPRI provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition in developing countries.

Erick Boy

Erick Boy

Erick Boy is the Chief Nutritionist in the HarvestPlus section of the Innovation Policy and Scaling Unit. As head of nutrition for the HarvestPlus Program since 2008, he has led research that has generated scientific evidence on biofortified staple crops as efficacious and effective interventions to help address iron, vitamin A, and zinc deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and South Asia.

Back

What we do

Since 1975, IFPRI’s research has been informing policies and development programs to improve food security, nutrition, and livelihoods around the world.

Where we work

Back

Where we work

IFPRI currently has more than 600 employees working in over 80 countries with a wide range of local, national, and international partners.

Why should we make staple foods more nutritious?

Open Access | CC-BY-4.0

1_kidswithgrain_irri

The following post by HarvestPlus director Howarth Bouis is part of an ongoing series of blog stories celebrating IFPRI’s 40th anniversary. Each story authored by current and former IFPRI research staff highlights a key research topic through the years from the personal perspective of the researcher.

When I first joined IFPRI in 1982 as a post-doctoral fellow in the Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, energy (calorie) intakes were regarded as the key indicator for improvements in human nutrition.  Back then, the conventional wisdom was that energy intakes improved rapidly with relatively small increases in income.  The poor were hungry and, as their incomes increased, they bought greater amounts of food staples to satiate this hunger. I totally bought into this popular line of thinking at the time.

In 1984-85, Lawrence Haddad and I undertook surveys in Bukidnon in the southern Philippines, the results of which convinced us that such thinking was misguided. For the same 450 households, we collected data on food consumption/intake in two different ways: asking about food expenditures, which was the methodology typically used by economists; and a 24-hour recall on food intakes, which was a methodology used by nutritionists. Much to our surprise and initial dismay, the two methodologies presented completely different dietary patterns as household incomes increased. The food expenditure data set mirrored the conventional wisdom, while the food intake data set (collected originally primarily to look at intra-household food distribution) showed a constant food staple intake, as shown in the table below (Bouis 1994, Table 6):

Countries


Topics


Donors

No donors listed

Previous Blog Posts